• The purpose of the the Economic Policy Centre (EPC) is to promote high quality research and debate across all areas of economics in a free democratic society.
    The EPC's vision is to close the gap between economic policy and knowledge. Ultimately it brings together economic opinion formers - in academia, business, the media and government - in new and innovative ways.

  • Micro-hydro – huge potential for the UK?

    March 4th, 2010

    I keep thinking about this trip I went on last weekend – a tour of micro-hydro plants organised by the South Somerset Hydropower Group. It was a good deal – for £60, we got lunch, coffee x 3 and bussed around 6 quite different micro-hydro sites, with plenty of expert commentary, not least by some very proud owners – full details here. At this time of year as well, these plants are working nearly flat out,  because there has been so much rain (and lots of mud too – I’m such a townie!). Load factors of 70+% are right now about the norm.

    Anyway, here’s one of my favourites of the day, Hainbury Mill which has an archimedes screw. The benefits of this technology are that it is; very fish-friendly, virtually no filtering out of river debris required and it’s really quite unusual to look at.

    With feed-in-tariffs coming in from the 1st April, it’s anticipated that a mini-boom might come about for micro-hydro. Let’s see – I wouldn’t hold my breath for any government scheme scaling up quickly and efficienctly. For all that, this is different to the pre wind rush of just over a decade ago. Back then, complex regional monitoring of windspeeds was required to get an idea of where the best locations were. This time, the UK already knows where its long-retired 30,000 mills are located and technology has come a long way in the last few years, to enable the extraction of power from low head sites. And micro-hydro has much higher availability, works at a higher load factor – even contributing baseload power than those poster childs of the micro-generation sector – wind and solar.

    One more picture – I thought this mill won the beauty prize – Hewletts Mill.

    144 years on, the Jevons Paradox has never been more valid

    December 15th, 2009

    Writing on Western Europe’s most successful political blog today – www.conservativehome.com , I explored one of the themes I developed from the EPC’s launch paper – SECURING OUR ENERGY FUTURE – Why and how it must be done – Energy Efficiency and why it ultimately increases energy consumption. This is a very old idea put forward by Economist William Stanley Jevons in 1865. Yet today, received opinion wants to spend bilions and billons on energy efficiency. So meet William . . .

    And read my article here;

    Dan Lewis: More energy efficiency will ultimately increase, not reduce, demand for energy

    It just shocks me sometimes how much our political class has been so blindingly taken in by the energy efficiency lobby . . .

    SECURING OUR ENERGY FUTURE – Why and how it must be done

    December 14th, 2009

    SECURING OUR ENERGY FUTURE – Why and how it must be done

    Download here.

    In the launch paper of a new think tank, the Economic Policy Centre, a radical overhaul is called for in UK Energy Policy, as featured today in The Engineer and in an op-ed by Dan Lewis in the Yorkshire Post.

    The paper calls for;

    i) A return to basics – putting energy security first

    ii) Scrapping of wasteful programmes – smart meters, carbon capture levy, government-financed R&D

    iii) Creation of Clean and Secure Energy Obligation – based on Renewables Obigation but with 100% target by 2060 at a much lower buyout price and the inclusion of big impact technologies nuclear, large hydro, interconnectors and Severn Tidal Barrage / tidal lagoons

    iv) Keeping coal-fired stations open beyond 2015 until new clean and secure plants come onstream

    v) A new annual ranking system that keeps track of the energy security footprint and to create a competitive merit order

    vi) Creation of clear lines of political responsibility for energy security

    Says author and Chief Executive of the Economic Policy Centre, Dan Lewis;

    Britain has too much energy policy and it is back to front – it’s crazy to go on over-rewarding low impact, intermittent technologies while failing to secure investment for big impact, long lifespan, clean and secure technologies like large hydro, nuclear, interconnectors and a Severn Tidal Barrage or Tidal Lagoons. This will only lead to even greater future dependence on expensive, tight supplies of imported gas and very possibly, power cuts from the middle of the next decade. All this because government has failed to prioritise and factor in the energy security footprint of its own policy“.